| With CCD imagery grabbing a foothold in all aspects 
							of amateur photography, it seems moot to discuss 
							film. I tend to agree - there serves no purpose to 
							discuss film in astrophotography since even this 
							hobby has be assimilated to use computer technology. 
							The benefits of using 
							CCD's over film are just too 
							great, but there is a certain nostalgia when 
							thinking about film - and to understand photography 
							to its fullest, learning about film is required (in 
							my opinion).
 Film, in its most basic form, is 
							simply the formation of Silver Halide crystals 
							residing on a gelatin base. While the gelatin serves 
							no purpose other than to "hold" the image, the 
							Silver Halide crystals provide the magic. These 
							crystals respond to light so that development 
							(chemicals designed to stop the reaction of silver 
							halide to light) locks in the crystals change to 
							light. The result is a culmination of thousands of 
							crystals of various "color" resulting in an overall 
							image. The idea is fascinating but really simple.  Color photography uses died crystals that respond 
							to whatever wavelength to which they correspond, but 
							the idea is the same. Chemicals are used  to 
							extract the final image. Almost immediately it is evident that several 
							problems exist: 
								crystalline structure of each film will not 
								be exactChemicals used to extract images are mixed, 
								and variations occur As such, photography obviously more artistic than 
							exact since every step of photography is not 
							precise: crystal count can vary, percentages of 
							chemicals vary, temperatures of the chemicals can 
							vary, light exposure to the film can vary, and so 
							on... But dealing with that variability is what 
							separates a professional from an amateur. Experience 
							in chemical use, exposure techniques, film bias, and 
							so on greatly affects the outcome of the image. Patience... To understand film photography in Astronomy, 
							nothing is better than Michael Covington's book 
							Astrophotography for the Amateur (see the
							reference 
							section) - this book is also good for understanding 
							film in general. Of the one area of astrophotography does film 
							reign supreme is the capture of star trails: 
							 This image is taken with a 35mm SLR 
							(Single Lens Reflex) camera in a stationary position 
							with the shutter open for an extended period of 
							time. One of films disadvantage allows for 
							this dramatic image to be captured - that is because 
							film is NOT linear, the overall image does not 
							saturate. The term for this is called reciprocity 
							failure and means that the longer film is 
							exposed, the less sensitive it becomes. Back to Top |