| Solving the Solar Neutrino Problem - by Ricky Leon Murphy: IntroductionEarly History and the 
		Standard Model
 The Solar 
		Model and the first Neutrino Telescope
 The Solar Neutrino Problem
 Gaining Perspective
 Sudbury Neutrino Detector
 What Does This Mean?
 The Future
 Summary
 References
 
 
		
		Back to Solar System Introduction:  In order to explain the Beta-decay process, 
		Wolfgang Pauli discusses an undetectable, mass less particle that 
		assists in carrying away energy. Enrico Fermi names it the neutrino. 
		Particle Physics defines the neutrino, and the solar model depends 
		greatly on its existence. After all, if fusion is occurring within the 
		core of the Sun, neutrinos are a natural by-product. The first 
		experiments in detecting the neutrino is successful, and John Bahcall 
		and Ray Davis predict the number of neutrinos emanating from the Sun, 
		and build an experiment to test the theory. The results are problematic. 
		Only one third of the neutrinos predicted are detected by this first 
		neutrino telescope. Continual study yields the same result. Other 
		detectors are built some time later only to confirm the result. Is the 
		Solar Model incorrect? Does something happen to the neutrinos? Is it a 
		question of detector sensitivity? With continued observation, only very 
		recently have these questions been answered. The most recent neutrino 
		telescope, the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory, has released data that 
		solves the Solar Neutrino Problem. While the Solar Model is preserved, 
		now the Standard Model is challenged. Back to Top |
		
		Back to Solar System 
		Early History and the Standard Model: As with all things, there is a beginning. The year 
		is 1931, and Wolfgang Pauli explains the Beta-decay process for the 
		first time. In radioactive decay, a neutron breaks down into a proton, 
		electron, and missing energy. This process is called the Beta-decay (ß-decay). 
		This missing energy is carried away by an unseen, mass less particle 
		that Enrico Fermi later names the neutrino [R2]. 
		Particle Physics is born. Here is the ß-decay 
		(Kitchin, 
		page 149): n 
		  to 
		  p+ + e-   +  νe[1] In 1959 the challenge of detecting this enigmatic 
		particle was answered by Clyde Cowan and Fred Reines, whom design and 
		build a neutrino detector underground near a nuclear reactor in Hanford, 
		Washington [R5] 
			
				|  (Image Credit)
 | This detector is filled with 400 liters of 
				water and cadmium chloride, and measures the interaction between 
				neutrinos emanating from the nuclear reactor and a proton within 
				the nucleus of the cadmium atom. The neutrino interaction was 
				captured by photo-detectors as a flash of light lasting just a 
				fraction of a second [R5].				  The experiment was a complete success, and the neutrino was 
				detected for the first time. |  This early method of detecting sub-atomic particles 
		paved the way to countless future experiments in an attempt to identify 
		all sub-atomic particles. By the 1970’s, a unified theory of sub-atomic 
		particles was released. This theory, called the Standard Model, has 
		lasted even through today [R6]. 
		While the theory itself is rather complex, the basic premise is not. All 
		matter as we know it today is comprised of any combination of 12 
		fundamental particles. The word ‘fundamental’ in this case means the 
		particle cannot be broken down into smaller parts. Here are the 12: 
			
				|  | The bottom two rows belong to the 
				Generation II and Generation III group, consecutively. The first 
				row are Generation I particles. Protons and neutrons are a 
				combination of three ‘up’ and ‘down’ quarks. The electron is a 
				fundamental particle along with its partner, the electron 
				neutrino.   (Image Credit) |  According to the Standard Model, particles in the 
		Generation III column decay to the Generation II column. Likewise, the 
		particles in the Generation II column decay into the particles in the 
		Generation I column [R6]. 
		In other words, the tau particle decays to a muon particle releasing a 
		tau neutrino. Likewise, the muon decays to an electron releasing a muon 
		neutrino. This is important to remember as this will be challenged later 
		by the solar neutrino experiments. What does the Standard Model say about neutrinos [R10]? 
		  Neutrinos have very little or no mass.There are three “flavors:” Electron neutrino, 
			muon neutrino, and tau neutrino.Neutrinos have no electric charge.Neutrinos have a spin of ½.Neutrinos have weak interactions, meaning they 
			can pass though the Earth unimpeded. Neutrinos have an associated anti-neutrino 
			that spins opposite, with the following rule: a neutrino spins left 
			and an anti-neutrino spins right. Back to Top |
		    
		Back to Solar System 
		The Solar 
		Model and the first Neutrino Telescope: The Sun’s energy is generated by the fusion of 
		hydrogen into helium in the core. The process of this fusion is called 
		the Proton-Proton Chain. The initial theory of this fusion process was 
		designed by Hans Beth in the 1930’s [R2] 
		and later expanded by John Bahcall [R8]. 
		The expanded Solar Model allowed for the prediction of neutrinos 
		emanating from the Sun per second. Knowing this, the Inverse Square Law 
		can be applied to predict the flux per meter square here on Earth. Based 
		on the Proton-Proton Chain, or P-P chain, the core of the Sun produces 
		1038 neutrinos per second. Bahcall predicted that 1011 
		neutrinos per meter square here on Earth (Universe, 
		page 398). There are actually three sources of neutrinos by fusion 
		processes within the Sun’s core [R8] 
		[R1]: The First Process:                                                1H+ 
		  + 1H+      
		  to     2H+ + 
		  e+ + νe e+ 
		+ e-     to 
		       2γ Two Hydrogen protons are fused to create deuterium 
		(2H), a positron (e+), and an electron neutrino (νe). 
		The positron annihilates into an electron and creates two gamma rays. 
		   
		1H+ + 2H+    
to 
		    3He++ 
		+ γ A single Hydrogen proton is fused to the newly 
		created Deuterium and creates a light isotope of Helium (3He) 
		and a gamma ray.  3He++ + 3He++  
		  to 
		     4He++ + 1H+ + 1H+ Two of the light isotopes of Helium are fused to 
		form the “normal” Helium atom and two extra Hydrogen protons. This 
		entire process provides 85% of the supplied neutrino flux. The Second Process:              		 3He++ 
		+ 4He++  to      7Be+ +γ		 Helium and light helium fuse to form beryllium (7Be+) 
		and a gamma ray.   7Be+ + e-   
		  to 
		      7Li 
		  + νe  Beryllium adds an electron to form lithium (7Li), 
		and releases an electron neutrino.           7Li   + 1H+    
		to     4He++ 
		+ 4He++ The lithium adds a photon of hydrogen to split to 
		two helium atoms. This entire process releases only 15% of the neutrino 
		flux. The Third Process:                                          3He++ 
		  + 4He++  to    7Be + γ Light helium and helium fuse to form beryllium and 
		a gamma ray.             7Be + 1H   
		to    
		8B + γ  The beryllium fuses to a hydrogen proton to create 
		boron (8B) and a gamma ray. 8B     
		to   8Be + e+ 
		+ νe The boron is unstable and releases an electron and 
		an electron neutrino to become beryllium once again.    8Be   
		to    4He++ +
		4He++  The remaining beryllium continues to remain 
		instable, and breaks apart into a pair of helium. This entire process 
		only releases 0.02% of the total neutrino flux. This is the solar model in its entirety. Based on 
		the above predictions of neutrino flux, John Bahcall and Ray Davis begin 
		to construct the first experiment to detect solar neutrinos. To build 
		such a detector, a location needed to be found, and a medium in which to 
		capture the neutrino needed to be selected. Since neutrinos have weak 
		interactions, they can pass straight through the Earth with little 
		difficulty (Kitchin, 
		page 149). On the other hand, other radiation cannot travel though the 
		Earth. The perfect location for any neutrino detector is deep under the 
		surface. The choice for the first neutrino detector was Homestake gold 
		mine in South Dakota. As suggested by Bruno Pontecorvo and Luis Alvarez 
		in the 1940’s [R2], 
		a chlorine solution was chosen to capture neutrinos. Here is the Homestake Neutrino Detector (otherwise 
		known as the Brookhaven Solar Neutrino Observatory): 
			
				|  | Since such a large amount of liquid (600 
				tons) was required, a relatively inexpensive chemical was chose. 
				Standard dry-cleaning solvent (tetrachloroethene) was perfect 
				since it was available in such large quantities.   As the neutrino collides with the chlorine 
				atom, the added energy creates an argon atom. As the argon 
				looses energy, helium is released and bubbles to the surface.
				(Image Credit) |  These reactions were counted to indicate the number 
		of neutrinos reacting in the chamber. This particular chamber is called 
		a Chlorine 37 detector (Kitchin, 
		page 151). Because of the fairly low sensitivity of this detector, the 
		neutrino flux is measured from this high energy source: 8B   
		  to 
		    8Be + e+ + νe  by the following reaction:                          νe  
		  +    37Cl  to  37Ar  +  e- The results proved that neutrinos emanating from 
		the Sun do exist, but the number of neutrinos detected here on Earth, 
		called the flux, was one-third the number of predicted neutrinos.  
		  Could the model of solar fusion be incorrect?Could the method of detection be incorrect? The culmination of the results taken from Homestake 
		inexorably created the “Solar Neutrino Problem.”  Back to Top |
		
		Back to Solar System The Solar 
		Neutrino Problem and the next generation detectors: For more than two decades, the answer to the Solar 
		Neutrino Problem remained unsolved. Realizing the possibility that 
		sensitivity might be the cause of the problem, two experiments were 
		designed to detect neutrinos of a lower energy. These detectors are 
		identical in their design, but different in overall capacity.
 
			
				|  | Using 60 tons of liquid metallic gallium, 
				the SAGE (Soviet-American Gallium Experiment) detector is 
				designed to look for the reaction [R7]: 71Ga + νe 
				to 71Ge 
				+ e- By counting the radioactive atoms of 
				germanium, the neutrino flux is calculated.    An identical experiment in Italy, called 
				GALLEX (GALLium EXperiment), used only 30 tons of gallium.Both of these experiments, although more sensitive, supported 
				the Davis experiment by only detecting 50 to 60% of the neutrino 
				flux [R8]. 
				(Image Credit)   |  Two other detectors using water as the media, while 
		originally designed to examine proton decay, proved successful in 
		detecting solar neutrinos. The Kamiokande and the IMB 
		(Irvine-Michigan-Brookhaven) detectors are underground water tanks lined 
		with a tremendous number of photomultiplier tubes. The Kamiokande weighs 
		in at 3000 tons while the IMB weighs in at a tremendous 8000 tones. 
		Because of this design, there is an added benefit: the direction of the 
		neutrino interacting with the water molecules can be tracked. The detection method is looking for what is called 
		the Cherenkov effect. When a neutrino interacts with a proton within the 
		water molecule, an inverse ß-decay 
		occurs (Kitchin, 
		page 153). This is the reaction:                   νe
		  + p to n + e+ The positron (e+) is released in the 
		same direction of the neutrino, with a speed in excess of the speed of 
		light in water – which is 225,000 km/s (Kitchin, 
		page 153). This creates an optical shock-wave called Cherenkov 
		radiation. These effects are counted to determine neutrino flux. The sensitivity of both detectors was enough to 
		study the flood of neutrinos emanating from a supernova – SN1987A. While 
		sensitive in their ability to detect neutrinos from such a distance, the 
		measure of the solar neutrino flux agrees with all previous solar 
		neutrino experiments. With the added benefit of determining the 
		direction of the neutrino, solid evidence was presented that the source 
		is indeed the core of the Sun.In order 
		to further increase sensitivity, the groups responsible for Kamiokande 
		and IMB joined forces to design and build the Super-Kamiokande Neutrino 
		Observatory. 
 
			
				|  | Based on the success of the previous 
				water-based experiments, the Super-Kamiokande contains and 
				enormous 50,000 tons of water. In the shape of a cylinder, 
				photomultiplier tubes line the inside cylinder wall, the floor, 
				and the ceiling of the detector.    With such a large capture area, this 
				detector was able to detect muon neutrinos emanating from the 
				Sun.   While the results still counted only 55% of 
				the total neutrino flux, the detection of the muon neutrino gave 
				the first clue that neutrinos might be oscillating [R10].   In a sad turn of events, tragedy struck the 
				Super-Kamiokande detector on November 12, 2001. A single 
				photo-detector imploded creating a shockwave that damaged 
				several thousand photo-detectors. The damage was repaired, and 
				the detector has begun operations on January 18, 2003
				(http://dumand.phys.washington.edu/~superk/. (Images 
				Credit) |  Back to Top |
		
		Back to Solar System
 Gaining perspective: The results so 
		far.
 Over 20 years have spanned, and a solution to the 
		Solar Neutrino Problem has not been found. However, the technologies 
		have improved and the culmination of these results will lead to a final 
		solution. The results matrix (hyperlinks 
		attached to detector name links to the appropriate homepage): 
   
          
            | Detector | Date of Operation1 | % 
		of flux1 | neutrino energy | Directional |  
            | Homestake | 1970 - 1995 | 33% | High energy | No |  
            | SAGE | 1990 - 2006 | 58% | Low energy | No |  
            | GALLEX | 1991 - 1996 | 60% | Low energy | No |  
            | IMB | 1982 - 19912 | 51% | Low energy | Yes |  
            | Kamiokande | 1986 - 1995 | 54% | Low energy | Yes |  
            | Super-Kamiokande | 1995 - | 47% | Low energy | Yes |  1Data 
		from:
		    
		http://cupp.oulu.fi/neutrino/nd-sol2.html 2Data 
		from:
		
		http://www.phys.cmu.edu/~clark/imb.html 
 The results so far agree with the Solar Neutrino 
		Problem. There are not enough neutrinos detected to justify the current 
		solar model. Several possible solutions are: 
		  The core temperature of the Sun is 10% less 
			that the predicted value.Something is happening to the neutrinos 
			between the Sun and Earth.Neutrinos may be oscillating between flavors. While a 10% reduction in core temperature would 
		agree with the predicted neutrino flux, other effects would follow. For 
		example, a 10% reduction in core temperature would conflict with Wien’s 
		Law – or the relationship between wavelength and temperature (Universe, 
		page 101). Since neutrinos are weak interactive particles, 
		there is little to affect their trajectory, so something happening to 
		the neutrinos between the Sun and Earth is highly unlikely based on the 
		Standard Model. The idea that neutrinos oscillate, that is change 
		from electron neutrino to muon neutrino to tau neutrino at random, has 
		gained favor since the Super-Kamiokande was able to detect a muon 
		neutrino coming from the Sun. The Sudbury Neutrino Observatory would 
		support this idea [R10]. Back to Top |
		
		Back to Solar System The 
		Sudbury Neutrino Observatory to the rescue: The Sudbury Neutrino Observatory, or SNO, is built 
		deep underground in Creighton mine in Sudbury, Ontario. This observatory 
		is different from the other neutrino detectors as this one uses heavy 
		water, and is actually capable of detecting all three “flavors” of 
		neutrinos [R9]. 
			
				|  | The detector consists of 1000 tons of very 
				pure heavy water in a 12 meter sphere. This sphere is enclosed 
				in a clear plastic sphere 22 meters in diameter and is suspended 
				by ultra-pure regular water. Surrounding that sphere is a 
				geodesic sphere containing over 9000 photomultiplier tubes [R9].   Just like the Kamiokande, IMB and Super-Kamiokande 
				detectors, the SNO is looking for the Cherenkov radiation 
				emitted by neutrino interactions.    The detector was completed, and began 
				operation in November 1999. The first scientific results were 
				released in June 2001. These first results confirmed the 
				oscillating nature of the neutrino [R9].
				(Image borrowed from:
				
				http://www.sno.phy.queensu.ca/)  |  
				| The detector is designed to look for three 
				different reactions. This is the reason for its sensitivity. 
				These reactions are [R9]: Charged Current Reaction (CC): ve + d 
				  to p + p + e- Neutral Current Reaction (NC): vx[2] + d to p + n + vx Elastic Scattering Reaction (EC): vx + e-
				  to vx + e-    
				     The CC reaction is very sensitive to the 
				electron neutrinos, while the NC (the most sensitive) and the EC 
				reactions are sensitive to all three “flavors.” |  |    The results as of June 2001 show that the total 
		number of all neutrinos matches the predict flux first theorized by John 
		Bahcall. According to this experiment, the Solar Neutrino Problem has 
		been solved [R3]. In order to test and repeat these results, the SNO 
		performed another experiment called “Day versus Night.”. Basically, the 
		observatory wanted to rule out any possibility of additional 
		radioactivity that could have skewed the result. The results released in 
		April 2002 matches the initial result in 2001. In addition, the number 
		of electron neutrinos counted by this experiment totaled 1/3 of the 
		total number of neutrinos. This is proof that oscillation is occurring 
		between all three “flavors” of neutrinos [R9]. In May of 2003, two tons of ultra-pure table salt (NaCl) 
		was added to the SNO detector to improve the NC reaction sensitivity [R4]. 
		The result is an increase in detector sensitivity three-fold. On 
		September 7, 2003, a press release was issued by the SNO that confirmed 
		the initial results showing that neutrinos do indeed oscillate between 
		all three “flavors.”  Back to Top |
		
		Back to Solar System What do 
		these results mean?:  The results from SNO show: 
		  The total number of neutrinos detected equal 
			the total of neutrinos predicted.The Solar Model is correct – fusion is the 
			source of energy within the Sun.Neutrinos oscillate between electron neutrino, 
			muon neutrino and tau neutrino.The increased sensitivity of SNO allowed 
			detection of all three neutrinos. What does this mean for the Standard Model? In the 
		spirit of the scientific method, these results need to be tested and 
		compared to further experiments from particle physics. The 
		contradictions SNO creates for the Standard Model are: 
		  All three “flavors” of neutrinos are detected 
			emanating from the Sun’s core. According to the Standard Model, 
			neutrinos are released when their companion particle decays towards 
			the Generation I particle.According to SNO, neutrinos oscillate between 
			“flavors” indicating that neutrinos have mass. The Standard Model 
			states that neutrinos do not have mass. Back to Top |
		
		Back to Solar System What the future 
		holds: Other elements are believed to be even more 
		sensitive in detecting neutrinos. While such telescopes are yet to be 
		constructed, Iridium, Lithium, and Potassium-Hydroxide are thought to 
		provide a more sensitive media, but cost and availability could hinder 
		such projects (Kitchin, 
		page 155 to 157). So far, our current ability to detect neutrinos is 
		only possible from the Sun, supernova, failed supernovae, and know 
		Gamma-Ray Bursts (GRB’s).  Since neutrino oscillation has presented itself, 
		one future project bear mentioning. A worldwide collaboration project is 
		in the design phases. Laboratories in France, Germany, Italy, Russia, 
		Japan, and the United State are working on the LENS project, or Low 
		Energy Neutrino Spectroscopy. This detector will be using the following 
		reaction [R11]: νe 
		+ 176Yb to 176Lu* 
		+ e- then to
		176Lu + g It is thought that this reaction is stable enough 
		to allow real-time analysis of a neutrino. The sensitivity of this 
		detector will allow the study of the least energetic neutrino, the ones 
		from the initial P-P chain [R11].		 Back to Top |
		
		Back to Solar System Summary: The study of the neutrino is an excellent example 
		of the scientific process. An idea is proposed to explain a process – in 
		this case, an explanation was proposed for the
		ß-decay. A theory is formulated 
		and experiments are designed to test the result. Neutrinos were 
		invented, theorized and later proved by experimentation. A model (which 
		is a theory with a design that is accepted) of energy production within 
		the core of the Sun was also tested by experimentation by detecting 
		neutrinos. While the initial flux did not match theoretical limits, the 
		experimentation continued. Improvements in detector design allowed more 
		sensitive measurements, and the persistence in testing ultimately 
		resulting in detecting the theoretical flux. The Solar Model was proven 
		to be correct: hydrogen protons are fused together to form helium with a 
		release of energy and neutrinos. Also in the spirit of the scientific 
		method, other observatories are designing alternate versions of neutrino 
		detectors to continue studying them. Just as the experimentation to 
		prove the existence of the neutrino led to neutrino detectors to study 
		the fusion process within the Sun, new designs in neutrino detectors may 
		allow studying neutrinos from other sources such as: gamma ray bursts, 
		supernova, and cosmic background radiation. Perhaps these new detectors 
		will allow us to see the theoretical neutrinos as an ingredient to Dark 
		Matter. In the mean time, Astronomers can now cross the Solar Neutrino 
		Problem off their lists. Back to Top |
		
		Back to Solar System 
		References:  [R1] 
		Bahcall, John. Solar Neutrinos:
		
		http://www.sns.ias.edu/~jnb [R2] 
		Boyle, Alison and Grimes, Ken. “Ghostbusting the Universe.” Astronomy 
		Magazine December 2003: 44 – 49. 
		Freedman, Roger A. Universe: 6th Edition. W.H. 
		Freeman and Company, 2002 [R3] 
		Foust, Jeff. “Solar Neutrino Problem Solved.” Spaceflightnow.com. 
		Online June 20, 2001.  Kitchin, 
		C R. Astrophysical Techniques: Third Edition. Institute of 
		Physics Publishing, Bristol and Philadelphia, 1998.  [R4] The 
		Particle Physics and Astronomy Research Council:
		
		http://www.pparc.ac.uk/Nw/Press/sudburysalt.asp [R5] 
		Neutrino History:
		
		http://wwwlapp.in2p3.fr/neutrinos/anhistory.html [R6] 
		Quinn, Helen. “Theory. Leptons.” Virtual Visitors Center. Online. 
		05 May 2003.  [R7] 
		Solar Neutrinos:
		
		http://zebu.uoregon.edu/~soper/Sun/solarneutrinos.html [R8] 
		Solar Neutrinos: Theory:
		
		http://cupp.oulu.fi/neutrino/nd-sol1.html [R9]The 
		Sudbury Neutrino Observatory:
		
		http://www.sno.phy.queensu.ca/ [R10] 
		What’s a Neutrino:
		
		http://www.ps.uci.edu/~superk/neutrino.html [R11] 
		Low Energy Neutrino Spectroscopy:
		
		http://lens.in2p3.fr/ 
 
				
				
				
				[1] n = neutron; p = proton; e = electron; ve 
				= electron neutrino 
		[2] 
		x = electron (e), muon (µ), 
		tau (t) 
		neutrinos 
 Back to Top |
Back to Solar System |